Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

January 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

US Supreme Court

Sunday, May 04, 2008

SCOTUS: Local blawg postings include Scalia interview and Kennedy fantasy camp

For you SCOTUS watchers, here are two posts I have picked up by local bloggers.

First, Marcia Oddi, Indiana Law Blog, has one on Justice Scalia:

Courts - Justice Scalia interview
CBS 60 Minutes host Leslie Stahl conducted a remarkable interview of Justice Antonin Scalia, broadcast last evening. You can read the transcript here, but I highly recommend that you watch the interview - links to Part I and Part II are available here.
Second, Dean Jim Chen has a post on Justice Kennedy:
Supreme Court fantasy camp: Justice Kennedy's chambers
My dear friend, Marie T. Reilly, has wistfully wished, "I wish there was Supreme Court fantasy camp."

Well, we can't quite make that happen. But Jurisdynamics and Ratio Juris can do the next best thing: bring Oyez.org's virtual Supreme Court tour to life. Herewith a sample — Justice Kennedy's chambers!

Sunday, February 17, 2008

SCOTUS: "Supreme Court considering 5 cases alleging age discrimination"

From Herald Leader:

There is only one anti-bias law - the one against discrimination based on age - that would cover all nine Supreme Court justices, if such laws applied to them.

The justices, ranging in age from 53 to 87, are the last people to worry about such things in their own lives. They have life tenure and no mandatory retirement age.

Yet the justices are confronted by allegations of age discrimination in five cases this term. While the sheer number of cases probably can be explained away as coincidence, the topic is one of growing importance as more people work longer because of economic necessity or by choice.

"The importance of protecting older workers as the work force ages is enormous," said Stu Cohen, AARP's director of legal advocacy. "More older workers remain in the workforce and projections are that the percentage will continue to expand."

The percentage of people 65 and over who continue to work has grown from 10.8 percent in 1985 to 16 percent last year, AARP said. For people 55 to 64, the numbers also are up, from 54.2 percent in 1985 to 63.8 percent in 2007.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

SCOTUS: "Supreme Court weighing fate of Kentucky retirement system"

The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing the fate of Kentucky's retirement system after hearing a challenge from a former public employee that the plan discriminates against older workers.
For more detailed information, go to SCOTUS BLOG WIKI FOR Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC

Monday, January 07, 2008

SCOTUS: More on execution by lethal injection case at SCOTUS with links to the written transcript and to the audio of the arguments today

And thanks to SCOTUSBLog.com for "The transcript of today’s argument in Baze v. Rees (07-5439) is now available here. In addition, audio of the oral argument is available for download here at Oyez.org."

Saturday, January 05, 2008

SCOTUS (updated): Here is some info on the upcoming execution by lethal injection case from Kentucy set for SCOTUS arguments on Monday, Jan. 7, 2008

Thursday, January 03, 2008

FREE LOUISVILLE SYMPOSIUM: "Chief Justice John Marshall: Origins and Consequences of Judicial Review"

The Alexander Hamilton Historical Society of Kentucky will hold a Jan. 19, 2007 symposium  entitled "Chief Justice John Marshall: Origins and Consequences of Judicial Review," at 10:30 a.m. in the Chao Auditorium in Ekstrom Library at the University of Louisville.

Per story in the Courier Journal,

The symposium is free and open to the public. A drawing will be held for a copy of "John Marshall: Definer of a Nation," a biography by Jean Edward Smith.

The 2-year-old Hamilton Society, which is open to the public, meets at 10:30 a.m. the third Saturday of each month at the St. Matthews Eline Branch Library, 3940 Grandview Ave.

For information, call society founder and president Lynn Olympia at 897-5726

Saturday, December 22, 2007

SCOTUS NEWS: "Justices to release audio of argument in death penalty case[ BAZE AND BOWLING FROM KY]"

The UNITED STATES Supreme Court said Thursday it will quickly release audio tapes after the Jan. 7 argument over the death penalty. The death row cases of Kentucky inmates Ralph Baze and Thomas Clyde Bowling Jr. present the question of whether the mix of drugs and the way they are administered in executions in three dozen states violate the Constitution. CLICK ON HEADING FOR MORE...

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

SCOTUS: "Witness for the persecution"

Here's an op-ed story on the new biography by SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas found at the Courier Journal: 

Witness for the persecution I believe in affirmative action, but I have to acknowledge there are arguments against it. One of the more cogent is the presence of Justice Clarence Thomas on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

SCOTUS a la SCOKY Blog: The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two Kentucky death penalty cases (Thomas Clyde Bowling & Ralphy Baze) apparently to review the constitutionality of lethal injection as a form of capital punishment

United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in 2 Kentucky Death Penalty Cases was posted at SCOKYBlog on 9/25/2007.

I waited a week to allow Trevor Wells' posting to gain some traction on this post independent of us.  By now, he will have hopefully posted some useful documents relating to this grant of cert for a Kentucky case.

The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two Kentucky death penalty cases (Thomas Clyde Bowling & Ralphy Baze) apparently to review the constitutionality of lethal injection as a form of capital punishment.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Jefferson County Public Schools Case at SCOTUS and a request for $750,000 in attorneys fees.

Today's Courier Journal posts on Teddy Gordon's motion for attorney fees in the Jefferson Public Schools integration case that he successfully argued before the United States Supreme Court.  The law provides for attorney fees to the prevailing party. 

Although some like to remark upon the quality of the work, do not forget the quality of the result - PREVAILING PARTY!  The attorneys from the Seattle suit are asking for much, much more.  Are those charges relevant?  Are the fees paid by the school to their lawyers for losing a relevant indicator on the value?

Winning may not be everything, but it is a condition precedent to an attorneys fee award in these types of cases.

Here is a link to the story:

The Louisville attorney who helped overturn Jefferson County Public Schools' student-integration policy is asking a federal judge to order the district to pay him $750,000 in fees and bonuses.
Here are a few of the pleadings filed on Mr. Gordon's behalf.  The various affidavits in support of the motion for attorneys fees are not posted here, eg. Stallings, Browne, Merrill, and Ricketts.