Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

January 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

Kentucky Politics Column

Friday, August 11, 2006

Ky Judicial Politics: Chief Justice Lambert's Premature Election, Selection, or Dejection?

Here's a head-scratcher prompted by a deeply analytical and thought-provoking posting by Retired Judge Stan Billingsley at LawReader entitled "The Early election for Chief Justice Lambert raises question about the beginning of his term."

This posting, as all of Judge Billingsley's postings, is strong on research, but this time methinks he stopped short of the real question - it's not so much a question about the beginning of Lambert's term, but rather the ending of his term and his legal authority to wear the Chief's robes after the expiration of that term (2007) and the dawn of a 'new' Supreme Court.

To summarize the salient points from that posting that piqued my posting, note the following:

  • The Chief Justice is the executive head of the Court of Justice under Section 110-5(b) of the Kentucky Constitution, to be elected by the other justices for a term of four years.
  • This provision of the Constitution was passed by the voters on Nov. 4, 1975 and became effective Jan. 1, 1976.
  • The four year terms would thus begin presumably from that initial date forward with a 'new' election for terms beginning each Jan. 1 for the years 1980, 84, 88, 92, 96, 2000, and 2004.
  • Therefore, the current term would seem to have begun on January 1, 2004 and if permitted to follow its normal Constitutional course, it would end Dec. 31, 2007.
  • Although the CJ is the head, the remainder of the Supreme Court is still nonetheless vested with policy-making and administrative powers per SCR 1.010 and 1.020.

Some might argue (including the 'new' Supreme Court in Jan. 2007) that Lambert's current term ends December 31, 2007 and that this summer's 2006 vote was of no legal consequence (somewhat like the obiter dictum in the famous footnote 16).   More of a vote of confidence since the term had not expired. 

When judicial terms are vacant now, they are filled by appointments pending elections for the remainder of the unexpired terms.  No reason to treat the Chief Justice any differently. 

For example, what if a justice whose term would expire in two years is elected as chief justice for a term of four years but fails to be re-elected?  Obviously, there is now a vacancy for the remaining two years of that unexpired term and the vacancy must be filled by election by the new justices.  When the normal four-year cycle ends, then a new election should be held.

However, the questions submitted now are:

  • Why was there an election called for the Chief Justice when one was not needed? 
  • Why was there an election called this year of all years with a guaranteed new majority on the bench in just six months?!
  • Why force a potential court-crisis upon the new majority if they should not want Lambert's leadership since a new court might not want to be saddled by a lameduck vote and want a new leader of their own choosing?
  • What happens if the new majority determines as either a policy or rule of constititutional interpretation that the term ends in 2007?  [Note that the new majority will be the final arbiter of not only the policy of the court but what the Constitution requires on that point!]
  • What if a single justice decides to air the decision and force a public ruling (and if not would any other judge or citizen have standing to question the legal authority of Lambert after 2007?)

Another mess in Frankfort?

Monday, July 31, 2006

Ky Politics: Steve Horner's Weekly Roundup of Government News

Steve Horner has posted his weely roundup of government news at www.Lawreader.com.  Click on the headline for his entire posting.  Here are some snippets:

Stumbo Investigation of Fletcher Administration
Merit System Hiring Practices
Week 63 in Review – July 29, 2006

  • LINK Rep Sent Report to Fletcher About Merit Positions
  • Un-indicted Co-Conspirators Identified
  • Fletcher Resurrects Rift at Murray
  • Rudolph Touts Fletcher’s “Monumental Accomplishments”
  • Highway Contractors To Hold Fletcher F/R
  • Fletcher To Appoint 17 Judges
  • Ted Jackson Unloads on the Fletcher Factor
  • Fletcher’s SurveyUSA Poll Numbers Marginally Better
  • Fletcher Denies First Amendment Issue in Blog Policy
  • Williams Calls Trade Rumor “Purgatory”
  • Harper Mulls Race Against Fletcher
  • State Democratic Party Far Behind Republicans in Fund-raising
  • Henry Cannot Announce Yet Because No Running Mate Picked

Monday, July 24, 2006

Steve Horner's Weekly Roundup of KENTUCKY Government News (No. 62, 7/22/2006) Posted at Lawreader

Stumbo Investigation of Fletcher Administration Merit System Hiring Practices
Week 62 in Review - July 22, 2006

Here are some of the topics covered!

Fletcher Claims Selective Prosecution; Lambert Footnote Debunked
Poll on Fletcher:  “Devastating”
Some in NKY Have Not Written Fletcher Off Yet; Has Bunning?
Political Consultants Discuss Fletcher Factor’s Impact on This Year’s Races
NKY Political Leaders Discuss Fletcher Factor’s Impact on General Election
Eight Contested State Senate Seats on November Ballot
Alessi Writes 3-Part Fletcher Series
Fletcher Dodges Arena Destruction Bullet
Legislation to Be Sponsored to Reverse Administration’s Blog Prohibition Policy
Two Web Sites Promote Rogers, Napier for Governor
Brereton Jones Talks About Running,  No Change in Other Dem Wannabes
Fancy Farm Forecast:  A Yawn 
Sen. Turner’s Trial Date Re-scheduled Second Time
Fletcher Appoints New KSP Commissioner
A-G Report Says “Unbridled Spirit” Creator Overpaid

Friday, July 21, 2006

Steve Horner's 'Politics in Kentucky' and Stumbo Investigation of Fletcher Administration Merit System Hiring Practice Week 61 in Review – July 14, 2006

Steve Horner's syndicated column 'Politics in Kentucky' which continues to highlight the "Stumbo Investigation of Fletcher Administration Merit System Hiring Practice Week 61 in Review – July 14, 2006" is now available at www.LawReader.com.

Here is a preview of what's inside:

Court of Appeals Orders Sealed Indictments Dismissed
Update on Fletcher-Withheld E-mails
Melcher Dismisses Indictment Against Nighbert
Fletcher Waiting to Set Up Legal Defense Fund
Fletcher Shrugs Off Criticism
Fletcher Floats Proposal to Amend Constitution To Appoint A-G and Treasurer
NKY Comment on Fletcher’s Re-electability and Fund-raising
Fletcher Draws Support With Pork
Stumbo Seeks Ouster of Personnel Board Chairman
Fletcher Sued by Organization Representing Nickolas
Poll on Fletcher Attributed to McConnell, et al

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Stepping Back From The Brink

Louisivlle attorney  John Dyche authored the following editorial about the governor, attorney general, the merit system probe, politics, and . . .

Stepping Back From The Brink
John David Dyche
Courier-Journal 11/30/2005

Monday, November 07, 2005

Ky. Politics: Former Justice Keller for State Senator?

From Steven Horner's Poltics in Kentucky Column at LawReader.com is an interesting piece digesting a Kentucky Gazette report on former Justice Keller, as follows:

Gazette Predicts Keller To Run Against Forgy Kerr

The Oct. 12 edition of The Kentucky Gazette reports that former state Supreme Court Justice James Keller will likely run next year against state Sen. Alice Forgy Kerr (R-Lexington).  Forgy Kerr is the sister of long-time Republican activist and losing gubernatorial candidate Larry Forgy of Lexington, who last lost the Supreme Court race to Keller in 2000.  Larry Forgy also lost the 1995 gubernatorial election to Paul Patton and the 1991 Republican gubernatorial nomination to Larry Hopkins.  Moreover, as the presumed party nominee in 1987, Larry Forgy suddenly withdrew shortly before the filing deadline leaving the party in a lurch. 

Keller will be stepping down soon from his position as co-chairman of the campaign of Fayette Circuit Judge Mary Noble who is running for the unexpired portion of Keller’s term against incumbent state Supreme Court Justice John Roach who was appointed in June by Fletcher to succeed Keller until next year’s general election.  Keller’s May 31 resignation from the high court cleared the way for Fletcher to appoint Roach, his general counsel, to the vacancy – a move which drew fire from newspapers across the commonwealth.  Roach has been subsequently implicated in the hiring scandal but has not been indicted by the grand jury. 

Forgy Kerr was first elected in 1998 and re-elected in 2002.  Keller is a registered Democrat .  The newspaper noted that Larry Forgy’s 32,500-vote defeat by Keller in 2000 “effectively ended Forgy’s political career,” and added this commentary:  “A Kerr vs. Keller race would give the Forgy’s (sic) a chance to settle the score – or, on the other hand, Keller would have the opportunity to not only beat Larry, but his sister, too.”

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Ky. Judiciary: Per "Politics in Kentucky" - Allegations Made That Supreme Court Appointee May be Implicated in Fletcher's Hiring Scandal

From Steve Horner's Column - "Politics in Kentucky" at LawReader.

Justice Roach Implicated in Hiring Scandal

Roach has been accused by two former Transportation Cabinet officials of allegedly having knowledge as far back as January of improper merit system hiring practices in the cabinet – when he was Fletcher’s general counsel.  Roach left Fletcher’s office on June 10 when he was appointed by Fletcher to replace retiring Justice James Keller.  Former cabinet general counsel Frank Miller, Jr. told Ryan Alessi for his Sep. 30 story in The Herald-Leader that he told Roach in several meetings last winter about a “growing trend of complaints about political hiring.”  Doerting told Alessi that Roach got personally involved in one merit system hiring decision.

Roach did not return Alessi’s phone calls.  Fletcher spokesman Brett Hall said on Sep. 29 that Fletcher was never advised of anything improper at the cabinet by Roach or by anyone else before being informed in early May that  Doerting told cabinet officials that he filed a complaint with the Executive Branch Ethics Commission.  This revelation by Doerting was shortly before he contacted Stumbo’s office about May 10.

Miller, who was fired by Fletcher around July 15, said that he informed Roach last winter that an unusual number of cabinet employees were filing appeals to the state Personnel Board concerning the cabinet’s hiring practices.

In a recent deposition, Doerting said Roach was involved in filling the vacant administrative manager position – a merit system-covered job – in  Jackson-based highway district 10.  Three cabinet employees applied for the position:  Billy Jack Montgomery, who eventually got it; Ron Easter; and Jim Maggard.  Alessi wrote that e-mails by Murgatroyd and Druen also indicate that Roach was involved.

State Sen. Julian Carroll (D-Frankfort), former governor from 1974-1979 and a lawyer, said that the governor’s general counsel has “an obligation to the governor to advise whether further exploration is needed” in such a case as this.  “In my judgment, the legal advice given to the governor early on was non-existent – in that no advice was given – or was certainly bad advice,” Carroll said.

Friday, October 21, 2005

Ky. News: GOP Defense Fund Not Doing Well

From Steven Horner's "Politics in Kentucky" column at Lawreader.

GOP Legal Defense Fund a Bust So Far

The fund established to assist Fletcher administration officials caught up in the investigation with their legal expenses has been a complete bust so far.  The fund’s trustee, Louisville Plate Glass Co. president Bill Stone, wouldn’t say how much money had been raised so far, according to an Oct. 8 story by Alessi.  “I’d rather not discuss that because it’s embarrassing to those who said they were going to do it,” Stone said about those who promised to raise money for the fund but whom he would not identify. 

The fund, called Kentuckians for Justice, was created in early June by state Republican general counsel Spencer Noe of Lexington and lobbyist Riggs Lewis of Louisville.   

Alessi reported that prominent GOP Frankfort lawyer Bill Kirkland asked the Franklin County Republican Executive Committee to donate $200 to the fund on Sep. 1, but his motion was rejected 4-9, according to the organization’s meeting minutes.  The same minutes said that Kirkland’s next motion – to give $500 to the Salvation Army for Hurricane Katrina relief – was approved. Kirkland told Alessi in an interview that he never volunteered to raise money for Kentuckians for Justice, and when reminded about his motion at the executive committee meeting, he replied, “I’d forgotten about that.”  Kirkland then wouldn’t even say whether he had personally donated to the fund.

Stone suggested that Fletcher’s pardons might have dampened interest in giving to the fund.  “People thought that the need was no longer there,” Stone said.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

Ky. Courts: Franklin Circuit Judges Graham and Crittendon Retiring

From Steve Horner's column "Politics in Kentucky" at www.Lawreader.com

After three years of speculation, The Kentucky Gazette ran a story in its e-mailed “Kentucky Political Report” on July 20 which apparently makes it “official” – both Franklin Circuit Judges do not plan to seek re-election next year. The newspaper said Judges William Graham and Roger Crittenden are the “most visible to the general public” of any of the state’s 95 circuit judges because of their jurisdiction over legal issues affecting state government. Franklin District Judge Thomas Wingate and Frankfort lawyer Philip Shepherd are interested in running for the two open judicial positions according to this story. Shepherd served as Secretary of the Cabinet for Natural Resources under former Gov. Brereton Jones.

Monday, September 05, 2005

Kentucky Politics - Stumbo Investigation Week 16

Politics in Kentucky - Week 16 Attorney General Stumbo's Investigation of Governor Fletcher's Cabinet
by Steve Horner
Posted at www.LawReader.com

Click here for link to entire article and prior articles.  Here is an extract and topics:

Fletcher Defiantly Issues Pardons and “Takes the Fifth”

           Saying the merit system hiring practices investigation was a “political tool” of state Atty.-Gen. Greg Stumbo, Gov. Ernie Fletcher pardoned all nine indictees thus far charged by the special Franklin County Grand Jury.  The language in Fletcher’s pardon would also seem to exonerate any future persons who would be indicted in connection with the inquiry which is probing whether merit system jobs were illegally filled on the basis of politics.  During a Capitol rotunda speech at 6p on Aug. 29 attended by about 150 non-merit employees whom he had appointed to jobs, Fletcher said, “I cannot allow state government to continue to be consumed by this game of political ‘gotcha’ paralyzing our ability to serve you, the people of Kentucky…Some of the indictments are the equivalent of conspiring to commit noodling out of season.”  (Noodling is a form of fishing, and his denigration of the charges to that level has drawn heavy criticism.)

             An Aug. 30 story by Ryan Alessi and Jack Brammer in The Herald-Leader said, “The crowd, crammed into the Capitol rotunda…cheered on Fletcher throughout his 15-minute address, giving the event the feel of a campaign speech.”  Assistant Atty.-Gen. Scott Crawford-Sutherland told Brammer and Alessi for an Aug. 31 story, “It’s a sad day in Kentucky when individuals will congregate and cheer the pardoning of persons charged with serious crimes.”

             Stumbo later issued a statement saying that he had “overwhelming” evidence of wrongdoing.  He said that Fletcher’s “administration cannot afford to allow the evidence to come out in court.  In pardoning these criminal defendants, the Governor has slammed the door on the public’s right to know what wrongs his administration has committed.  He has ensured that the people of Kentucky will never know the truth.”  Late on Aug. 29, Stumbo held a press conference and said, “Gov. Fletcher broke his promise to the people of Kentucky to cooperate fully with the investigation.”  At this press conference, Stumbo said that his office was “considering now whether to bring a challenge in court” to the pardons.  Additionally, Stumbo said that he had been in “preliminary conversations with the FBI” which he said was investigating Chicago Mayor Richard Daley for “exactly the same thing” as the Fletcher administration had done.

             An Aug. 30 story by John Cheves, Alessi, and Brammer said that U.S. Attorney Greg Van Tatenhove of Lexington on Aug. 29 declined The Herald-Leader’s request for a comment about any charges that Van Tatenhove could bring against Fletcher administration officials for political discrimination – a criminal offense under U.S. law.  A separate Aug. 30 story by Cheves said that U.S. Attorney David Huber in Louisville told Cheves that he has discussed this case with Stumbo.  (Huber leads U.S. prosecutors in Kentucky’s Western District and Van Tatenhove heads those in the Eastern District.) Most state government cabinets receive federal funds and the Transportation Cabinet (“cabinet”) receives a vast amount each year.  Any state officials involved with federal funds must abide by all federal laws – even those regarding hiring.  Gubernatorial pardons are irrelevant to a U.S. grand jury indictment.      

            Fletcher announced during his rotunda speech that he would appear on the next day before the grand jury, as subpoenaed, but would not “speak before this body.”  Indeed, Fletcher did appear on Aug. 30 and asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege not to testify.  Although most legal experts think that he has the power to do so, Fletcher told the rotunda crowd that he would not pardon himself. 

             Stumbo now is expected to call witnesses – including some or all of those pardoned – to investigate whether Fletcher, himself, was involved in the promotion of Billy Montgomery and the $14,111 salary increase for Jim Maggard – both merit system employees in the cabinet.  Two e-mails suggested that Fletcher could have promised a promotion to Maggard – one from former cabinet commissioner of administrative services Dan Druen and one from Fletcher’s deputy chief of staff Dick Murgatroyd when he, on Aug. 6, 2004, was cabinet deputy Secretary.  Murgatroyd gave the promotion to Montgomery and the raise to Maggard. Both Druen and Murgatroyd were indicted, are now pardoned, and cannot now invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege not to testify as they did previously at their grand jury subpoenaed appearances unless they become targets of a federal investigation into the scandal.  In a newspaper interview, Maggard said that he asked Fletcher for help on the promotion that Maggard wanted but that Fletcher never agreed to help him.

            Stumbo told Brammer and Alessi for a Sep. 1 story that he believed Fletcher issued the pardons “because he was in an untenable position, and he was afraid that people might come forward and cooperate.”

             On May 13 Stumbo began a probe into Fletcher’s hiring practices after state government whistleblower Douglas Doerting dropped a 276-page complaint into Stumbo’s lap around May 10.  Doerting was the cabinet’s assistant personnel director at the time, and his complaint alleged non-compliance with merit system procedures within the cabinet’s hiring and promotion practices.  Doerting retired on May 31.  The merit system law requires that rank-and-file employees must be hired, fired, promoted, or transferred on the basis of qualifications and not on the basis of politics.

             Fletcher, a Republican, has continually countered that Stumbo’s inquiry was politically motivated because Stumbo, a Democrat, wanted to use it as a weapon against Fletcher when Stumbo would run against Fletcher’s re-election bid in 2007.  Stumbo has repeatedly denied any such intention to run for governor.

             (Comment:  Fact 1:  The lead story in The Herald-Leader on Sun., Aug. 28 by Alessi quoted Druen as saying that he had asked his attorney “to explore all options.”  This continued speculation – that swirled immediately after Druen’s scheduled Aug. 26 arraignment was postponed – that Druen had decided to make a “deal” with prosecutors.  Druen would not comment further regarding this point, and the interview with Alessi did not reveal any major new information.  Druen was fired by Fletcher on July 19 and was indicted on 22 felony counts and 13 misdemeanor counts.  The other eight indictees each faced one or more misdemeanor charges and no felony charges.

            (Question 1:  Was The Herald-Leader’s Druen story on Aug. 28 the trigger for Fletcher’s hastily arranged rotunda pardoning speech on Aug. 29?  Were Fletcher and his officials afraid of dire consequences if Druen cracked and plea-bargained an agreement in exchange for his possibly damaging testimony?

             (Fact 2:  Lt. Gov. Steve Pence was notably absent from Fletcher’s rotunda speech, has been silent for weeks after attacking Stumbo in May and June for alleged “political motivations” for the investigation, and refused public comment about Fletcher’s pardons.  Before running for Lieutenant Governor with Fletcher in 2003, Pence was the U.S. Attorney for the U.S. District Court for western Kentucky and was the lead prosecutor in the BOPTROT scandal in the early 1990’s – when Joe Whittle was U.S. Attorney – that led to numerous bribery convictions against Kentucky legislators.

             (Question 2:   How long has Pence known about Stumbo’s alleged “preliminary conversations with the U.S. Attorney and the FBI?”  Is this why he has obviously distanced himself publicly from Fletcher?

* * *

Grand Jury Appearances

17% Would Vote for Fletcher’s Re-election – 73% Oppose Pardons

Stumbo Resigns   From Merit System Task Force

McConnell and Pence Decline Comment on Fletcher

Fletcher Won’t Fund EBEC and Personnel Board Investigations

Fletcher Issues “Talking Points” to Local Officials

Nighbert Reverses, Requests Pardons

Six Democratic Legislators Discuss Impeachment

Contract Lawyers Investigating Doerting

Doerting Voted for Fletcher

Newspaper Editorial Comments

Columnists’ Comments