Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

January 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

Headline Law News

Friday, April 06, 2007

Legal Headlines: Diet Drug Ruling Requires Chesley to Return Fees. Jury will decide the amount.

In the "diet drug attorney fee case",  Judge Wehr has granted summary judgment ruling that Ohio Lawyer Stan Chesley must return some of his $20 million legal fees.  Although it appears, he was overpaid by some $7 million, the jury will decide the actual amount.

Here's the story in the N.Ky.Post:

Cincinnati attorney Stan Chesley made too much money on the fen-phen diet drug settlement case and will have to give some of the $20 million back. * * *

Ford told the court Chesley should have gotten $13 million, not $20 million.

Wehr's order Wednesday did not state the amount Chesley should repay.

Ford had asked Wehr to make a summary judgment, which means an immediate ruling, but Wehr denied that request.

A jury will have to determine how much money the original plaintiffs ultimately will get and how much the attorneys will have to return.

[click on headline above for entire story]

UPDATED:  Pleadings, orders and other publicly available information from the courts on this case are available on line at attorney Angela Ford's web site at www.AngelaFordLaw.com @ http://angelafordlaw.com/public_access.php for case pleadings, court order, judicial conduct commission opinion, Supreme Court pleadings and orders, orders of temporary suspension of attorneys, and the Kentucky Supreme Court hearing transcript.

UPDATED: 

A judge has declined to put a dollar amount on what more than 400 former fen-phen plaintiffs may receive from the lawyers they sued.

Other recent headlines:

Continue reading "Legal Headlines: Diet Drug Ruling Requires Chesley to Return Fees. Jury will decide the amount." »

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Today's Kentucky Legal Headlines

Continue reading "Today's Kentucky Legal Headlines" »

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Ky Cases: Pike county wrongful death suit blames car accident on doctor's prescriptions

The following news story by Rachel Dove of the Williamson Daily News reports on a wrongful death action filed against various Pikeville physicians for prescribing medications to a West Virginia lawyer who killed a driver while medicated and who has subsequently been convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to ten years.
Victim's family seeking damages by Rachel Dove, Williamson Daily News
The late Varney resident who was fatally injured in a two-vehicle accident occurring on Jan. 10, 2006. Dixon's vehicle was struck by a SUV operated by Williamson attorney Lafe Preston “Dee” Ward.
The family of a Mingo County woman killed in an accident 14 months ago are seeking financial damages for physicians who treated a Williamson attorney charged in her death.
Pikeville Circuit Court records were unsealed to the public Friday, in the case of ‘The Estate of Benita Wirleen Dixon vs. Vellaiappan Somas-undaram M.D., J. Timothy Kohari, D.O., Primary Care Associates of Williamson, Diane E. Shafer, M.D., Lawrence B. Kelly, M.D. and unknown defendants'.
The civil suit, entered Jan. 10, 2007, was filed by Greg Dixon, husband and administrator for the estate of theDixon, represented by the Pikeville Law Firm of Miller, Carter and Lucas, has filed the suit with the intention of holding the  above listed physicians accountable for contributing to the death of his late wife.
Other recent news stories:

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Past Week's Kentucky Law-related News Stories

Continue reading "Past Week's Kentucky Law-related News Stories" »

Friday, April 07, 2006

Federal Courts: Federal Judge Does NOT Dismiss Suit of Newby Family Against former Louisville Police Officer Mattingly

From today's Courier-Journal is a story on the lawsuit in federal court involving the wrongful death action filed by the Estate of Michael Newby against former Louisville police officer McKenzie Mattingly. 

Basically, Judge Simpson denied Defendant Mattingly's motion for summary judgment to dismiss the estate's claims as genuine issues of material fact exist on the defense of qualified immunity.
 
Not only are we providing you a link to the CJ story, but a link to the actual trial order from district court!
Newby family can pursue Mattingly suit 
[Courier-Journal story][click on link for full story]
A federal lawsuit against a former Louisville Metro Police officer who fatally shot a 19-year-old will go forward after a judge ruled that a jury should hear the case.
Click here for PDF file of court's order!
Click here  for copy of Complaint filed on behalf of estate by attorney Thomas Clay.

Sunday, April 02, 2006

Kentucky Headline Law News - April 2, 2006

For week ending April 2, 2006

Politics in Kentucky by Steve Horner

Louisville Courier-Journal

Cincinnati Post (Northern Kentucky News)

Lexington Herald-Leader

WAVE3

University Law Schools News

Political Blogs

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Kentucky Law Headlines: Weeking Ending Mar. 26, 2006

Kentucky Headline Law News Week Ending Mar. 26, 2006

Politics in Kentucky by Steve Horner

Louisville Courier-Journal

Cincinnati Post (Northern Kentucky News)

Lexington Herald-Leader

Political Blogs

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Judicial Politics: Looking Back in Time

Today's posting on www.BlueGrassReport.org addressed, "Dr. Ernest Fletcher: In The Beginning..."   

What is notable about this story are the facts contained in news stories and comments from over a decade ago!  Facts showing the merger of partisan politics in judicial races; facts showing how the sodomy issue in Fayette County resulted in the targeting of a circuit court judge's election based upon a ruling from the bench.  What is it they say, "The more things change, the more they stay the same."

Welcome to the new political reality of money, partisanship, free speech, heightened activity by private groups and person, and and and.  Yes, it's also not that new.  It was happening in Lexington years ago, and our other two branches of government have been living that political reality since the inception of the political parties during President Washington's tenure.

From the Bluegrass Report story is the following extract:

GLOVES COME OFF IN FIGHT FOR FAYETTE CIRCUIT ROBE
Lexington Herald-Leader (KY)
October 24, 1991
Thomas Tolliver Herald-Leader staff writer

Fayette District Judge Lewis Paisley's 1986 ruling declaring Kentucky's sodomy law unconstitutional has come back to plague him in his race for Fayette Circuit Court judge.

...Two groups have joined forces to try to defeat Paisley and are distributing anti-Paisley literature around Lexington.

One flier has the headline Rally To H.E.L.P. (Help Eliminate Lewis Paisley).

"Lexington is becoming a Hot-Bed for growing Sodomy, Pornography and Violence against women and families," in part because of two of Paisley's rulings, the flier says.

The flier cites Paisley's sodomy ruling and a more recent ruling in which Paisley suppressed as evidence boxes of sexually explicit merchandise that police seized from an adult bookstore. Paisley said the search warrants were defective.

Paisley said his ruling was based on law and not his personal view of pornography.

"There are judges who sit in murder cases and have to suppress evidence," he said. "To say that that judge therefore is in favor of people murdering each other is ridiculous, and that's essentially what they're trying to do to me on the obscenity case.

"There's no question I suppressed this evidence. But they are arguing that that therefore means that I am in favor of the distribution of obscene matter in my community, which is a ridiculous charge."

Sunday, March 19, 2006

Headline News - Week Ending Mar. 19, 2006

Steve Horner's Kentucky Politics Column @ www.Lawreader.com

Lexington Herald-Leader

Louisville's Courier-Journal

Cincinnati / Northern Kentucky Post

Political Blogs

Thursday, March 16, 2006

News: The New Judicial Campaigning Gets Scrutinized Under the Blogoscope

Judicial campaigns and partisan politics came under the blogoscopic review of blogger Mark Nickolas and the BlueGrass Report (www.BlueGrassReport.org ) as he focuses in on Marcus Carey's candidacy for the Supreme Court and his appearances at partisan political rallies. 

Again, welcome to the new political reality of judicial campaigns where everybody knows your name, web sites are like daisies, and digital documents everything.

Here is a link to his story which makes for good reading about judicial candidates not only popping in on partisan meetings but actually emceeing the event.

Let me start by posting a few portions of Canon 5 of the Kentucky Code of Judicial Conduct which governs the conduct by judges and judicial candidates as it relates to inappropriate political activity.  * * *

A judge or candidate shall not identify himself or herself as a member of a political party in any form of advertising, or when speaking to a gathering. If not initiated by the judge or candidate for such office, and only in answer to a direct question, the judge or candidate may identify himself or herself as a member of a particular political party.

So, along these lines, it concerned me to read this in Pat Crowley's story in today's Kentucky Enquirer:

Lawyer Marcus Carey, a candidate for Kentucky Supreme Court, * * * received the Jim and Mary Bunning Award for service to the party.

...And this snippet on the website of the Oldham County Republican Party:

Oldham County GOP's 18th Annual 2006 Lincoln Dinner was held Sunday, February 19 at the Oldham County Community Center in Buckner.  The dinner drew its largest turn-out ever, with over 170 Oldham County Republicans and guests in attendance.  Nearly all Oldham County Republican candidates for office for 2006 attended the dinner.

Former 4th District GOP Chair Marcus Carey once again served as the emcee for the event.  Marc has filed to run in the non-partisan race for Kentucky Supreme Court Justice.