GOV'T: "E-Mail Now Allowed for Open Meetngs Notifications"
From Lawreader, E-Mail Now Allowed for Open Meetngs Notifications re Kentucky law.
From Lawreader, E-Mail Now Allowed for Open Meetngs Notifications re Kentucky law.
Brandon Ortiz's story from the Herald Leader focuses again of the behavior of those closely associated or related to members on our state's highest court. This story is about an internal appeal of a fired employee who claimed that the oldest son of Supreme Court Justice Will T. Scott was given preferential treatment when promoted in January.
Fired court employee's appeal loses
By Brandon Ortiz
bortiz@herald-leader.comThe state court system rejected Wednesday the internal appeal of a fired employee who claimed that the oldest son of Supreme Court Justice Will T. Scott was given preferential treatment when promoted in January.
The appeal was filed by fired Administrative Office of the Courts employee Ruth Combs, a pre-trial officer whose employment record includes three disciplinary probations since 1995. She questioned the promotion of the Pikeville justice's oldest son, Andrew H. Scott, 32, to her former job.
The case, which the AOC refused to make public, marked the second time that Andrew Scott was accused of being improperly promoted.
According to Wednesday's decision, written by retired Justice James E. Keller, Combs' appeal had accused Justice Scott of conspiring with AOC Director Jason Nemes to give the younger Scott a supervisor job in Perry County.
A three-person AOC appeals board said Combs' claim of favoritism had ”no merit whatsoever,“ but recommended reinstatement because the evidence used to justify her firing was presented after her termination.
Keller overturned the board's recommendation that Combs get her job back. Combs was fired in January.
Andrew Scott was first hired as a pre-trial officer on Aug. 16, 2005, according to personnel records supplied by the AOC.
Pre-trial officers are court employees responsible for interviewing defendants in jail and providing information to judges so they can set bond. They also monitor compliance for defendants on pre-trial release.
On May 1, 2007, he was promoted to supervisor, a job that paid $30,576. But barely three weeks later, Scott was demoted, AOC records show. He was allowed to keep his $2,784 a year pay raise.
On Wednesday night, Scott denied ever being demoted. He declined further comment.
Andrew Scott's demotion was the result of another appeal, said Prestonburg attorney Ned Pillersdorf, who represents Combs.
Pillersdorf said Andrew Scott, who had less than two years experience as a pre-trial officer, was promoted over a veteran pre-trial officer with 18 years experience.
He declined to identify the officer, but records from Combs' appeal shows that it is Tamara Van Hoose, who works in Magoffin County.
Van Hoose filed an administrative complaint in April 2007 when she heard rumors that Scott would be promoted over her, Pillersdorf said.
Internal administrative appeals are not public record because the court system is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. AOC also refused to release Scott's application for employment.
Documents in the case were given to the Herald-Leader by Combs' attorneys, Pillersdorf and Joe Childers of Lexington.
Pillersdorf is the husband of former Supreme Court Justice Janet L. Stumbo. Scott defeated Stumbo for re-election to the Supreme Court in 2004 after a contentious campaign. Stumbo is now a Court of Appeals judge.
In May, Will T. Scott, Andrew Scott and Nemes denied allegations of wrongdoing to the Herald-Leader.
”This is a political vendetta, but it comes with the job and I understand that,“ Will T. Scott said.
Replied Pillersdorf, ”I have a political vendetta against anyone who violates the rights of my clients.
”I got into this case because two employees of AOC came to me because they did not get a promotion because of Scott and Nemes,“ Pillersdorf said. ”And Ms. Combs is basically being fired, and, in my view, to allow Will Scott's son to get preferential treatment.“
Scott was promoted, again, from pre-trial officer to a pre-trial supervisor on Jan. 1., this time in Perry County.
According to an appeal letter written by Pillersdorf, Andrew Scott allegedly told a court system employee, Jim Marcum, that he got an earlier promotion after his father met with Nemes.
But Marcum, when reached in May, denied ever making such a statement. He repeated his denial at a hearing in June, according to Wednesday's decision.
Andrew Scott originally agreed to an interview request with the Herald-Leader in May. But he changed his mind after speaking with AOC lawyers.
”Because of the ongoing legal issues surrounding a confidential personnel matter of which you are aware, the AOC Office of General Counsel has advised me that it is inappropriate to speak to the media at this time except to say that I have never asked my father to intercede on my behalf regarding employment with the Administrative Office of the Courts,“ Scott said in a statement released by AOC. ”Any statements to the contrary are inaccurate.“
Nemes said he was not aware of Andrew Scott's promotion until Combs filed the appeal. ”I didn't know that he got this job until this appeals stuff came on,“ Nemes said. ”Did he get the job because he's Scott's son? The answer is, to my knowledge, no. I don't know if a supervisor made a decision, but it certainly didn't come up to me like that. He got the job because he's qualified for the job.“
On Dec. 1, 2007, Combs accepted a voluntary demotion, according to personnel records.
On Jan. 1, Andrew Scott was promoted to Combs' supervisor position and got another raise. He made $34,836 a year as of May. Combs was then fired Jan. 22.
Childers, one of Combs' attorneys, said she took a demotion because she felt she was being harassed by supervisors. She was planning on retiring in May.
Will T. Scott said his son got the promotion on his own.
”Whatever Andrew does or gets in pre-trial services, he has to earn. I mean, that's just the way I am,“ Scott said.
According to letters filed in Combs' appeal, she was accused of misinforming Perry Circuit Court Judge William Engle III about the status of a defendant's drug tests.
Engle told the Herald-Leader that he's not aware of ever being misled by Combs. But he also acknowledged to the appeals board that he did not double-check her work.
Engle said he was satisfied with her performance and had never complained to the Administrative Office of the Courts.
According to the appeals board decision, Combs was also accused of falsifying drug tests and attempting to get a man out of jail for violating the conditions of his pre-trial release. Once he was released, Andrew Scott said, he saw the man eating dinner with Combs.
Combs, hired in May 1984, does not have a clean employment record. According to personnel records released by AOC, she received a three-month disciplinary probation and two-day suspension in 1995. She signed a letter of understanding in 2002 and was put on six months disciplinary probation in 2003.
She received a written reprimand in 2004, and another six months disciplinary probation that year. In 2006, she was put on six months disciplinary probation and was suspended three days. She was put on another six months probation again in 2007.
The records do not state why she was disciplined.
The appeals board recommended reinstating Combs because the evidence against her was presented after her termination. But Keller, who was asked to review the case because Nemes recused himself, said the AOC was justified in continuing its investigation of Combs after her termination. He said the evidence against her and her past employment history were reason enough to fire her.
The decision is the final word in the administrative appeal process. But Combs has the right to appeal the decision to circuit court. Childers said she has not decided yet whether she will appeal.
This story follows previous stories, similarly focused:
"Reading the Mind of Congress: Legislative History Research on the Internet" 
KURT X. METZMEIER, University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law
The article discusses using U.S. Congressional resources on the Internet, in particular the Library of Congress' Thomas website. The paper focuses on how to use these tools to determine the legislative intent behind a statute.
SCOTUS decision reported in Herald Leader. Also, see SCOTUSWiki summary of decision with history, links, and analysis at KRS v. EEOC.
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Kentucky's retirement system does not discriminate against older workers.
The court, in a 5-4 ruling, says the retirement system reasonably takes age and length of service into account when structuring benefits for disabled workers who are eligible for retirement.
The April 17 ruling said the records were available, had been provided before and would not be a burden to the state police to provide again.
If anyone has a copy of the lawsuit previously filed by Sen. David Williams over the budget veto on roads, would you please scan it in PDF and email to us at kylawblog@yahoo.com ?
A reader has asked to read it.
Thanking you in advance!
Sometimes you have to scratch a story a little to get the entire feel of it. In this following story posted at the Kentucky.com web site, it appears that Gov. Beshear is blocking an appointment entirely on his own, but as the story unfurls and a few more facts are know, former Gov. Fletcher made some appointments before leaving office which were never approved by the Senate AND the House. Thus, do you have a simple nomination or an appoved appointment? Hopefully, this will not wind its way up to the Kentucky Supreme Court as alluded by the attorney nominated for the position.
Gov. Steve Beshear's administration is blocking the appointment of his predecessor's top aide to Kentucky's Mine Safety Review Commission.Stan Cave, who was former Gov. Ernie Fletcher's chief of staff, has objected to the claim by Beshear's general counsel that Cave's appointment wasn't properly confirmed by the General Assembly.
Cave has stepped aside from the commission "under protest" until the issue is resolved, the Lexington Herald-Leader reported.
The Lexington lawyer said in a statement that he hasn't decided what action, if any, to take, but said the issue "will ultimately have to be decided by the Kentucky Supreme Court." [click on heading for entire story].
Here is an updated story with more details and more complete reporting by the same Herald Leader blog - Beshear blocks two Fletcher appointments.