The Kentucky Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in a case that
asks how much due process individuals deserve before they are branded
as child abusers, the Courier-Journal reports.
Unlike the sex-offender registries that every state makes available on
the Internet, child offender lists generally aren’t accessible to the
public. A person doesn’t have to be convicted or charged with a crime to
be listed. In Kentucky, people are placed on it because a social worker
substantiates an allegation of abuse or neglect, according to the
newspaper. A man identified by his initials, W.B., sued to challenge
the protocol, fearing that being listed would cost him his teaching
post. [from the Wall Street Journal]
Comments