Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

January 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

« DIET DRUG TRIAL: "Lawyer Accused Of Fraud Bonds Out Of Jail" | Main | ARGS: Kentucky Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments Sept. 3 in London »

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

AOC: Committee formed to review court records retention

Recalling "Joan of Archives" and the destruction of many Jefferson County court records last year, the following story is of note.  However, even more curiouser is that not a single citizen or lawyer is on this committee who was not a public or former public official.  For what it's worth, you would think there would be some "information technology" folks to opinion on the digital side of the issue plus a few members of the bar and the public who might want to access those records.  Those who are to be served might have been useful to have been asked and allowed to serve on the committee.  Alas, Joan where art thou now?  Or at least a suitable replacement.

Chief Justice of Kentucky John D. Minton Jr. has formed a committee to review how the Kentucky court system retains, destroys and archives court records statewide. The new Court Records Retention Committee will meet for the first time Sept. 4.
read more below the 'fold'.

The CRRC members represent those with an interest in the preservation of court records, including judges, attorneys, circuit court clerks and personnel from the Administrative Office of the Courts. The members are Court of Appeals Judge Thomas B. Wine, who will chair the committee; Jefferson County Family Court Judge Patricia Walker FitzGerald; Senior Judge Roger L. Crittenden; District Judge Brandy O. Brown, who serves Clark and Madison counties; Woodford County Circuit Court Clerk Tricia Kittinger; Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney Ray Larson; Fayette County Attorney Larry Roberts; Damon Preston, director of the Trial Division of the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy; Kevin Smalley, manager of the AOC Division of Clerk Services; Jim Columbia, manager of the AOC Division of Records and Statistics; and Brian Sudduth, supervisor of the AOC Division of Accessioning.

“I appreciate Chief Justice Minton for bringing together all of the parties who use court records to figure out a plan for retaining necessary records and destroying those that have little or no value,” said Judge Wine.

“Above all,” he said, “this is an exercise in cooperation between the Executive and Judicial branches in carrying out a mandate given by the Legislative Branch. In 1977 the legislature gave the chief justice of Kentucky statutory authority to determine how court records are to be maintained. For 30 years the public has trusted the Supreme Court to carry out this responsibility. We are now asking agencies that use these records to work with the Judicial Branch to decide what to destroy and what to keep.”

Judge Wine said the committee will have three goals: “Our first priority is to ensure community safety by keeping the records prosecutors need to effectively prosecute individuals who have committed crimes against the commonwealth. Secondly, people are allowed to seek expungement of their criminal records under certain circumstances and we want the records to be available for them to do that. And finally, we have a fiscal responsibility that requires us to appropriately spend limited state funds.”

Based on KRS 26A.200-220, the AOC created a records retention policy in 1977 to address the cost and space involved in housing court records long-term. The policy called for misdemeanor records to be stored for at least five years before being destroyed. The policy was revised in 1996 and 2005. The 2005 amendment protected records that could be used to enhance future felony offenses and allowed the destruction of electronic copies of already purged paper records.

The records retention process came to the forefront in late 2006 when the AOC, following current guidelines, destroyed records in Jefferson County. Prosecutors and others called for a change to the records retention policy, maintaining that the destruction of records eliminated information necessary for enhancing the charges of offenders and other significant uses. After a panel recommended changes to the policy, the AOC announced in April 2007 that the destruction of all court records would be halted statewide until the issue could be further reviewed.

The AOC is currently storing 33,335 cubic feet of court records at the Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives in Frankfort at an annual cost of $4.56 per cubic foot, or approximately $152,000 per year. Of that total, 28,482 cubic feet are permanent records that cannot be destroyed under the current guidelines. Also of that total, 5,058 cubic feet of records are those that would have been destroyed under the current guidelines had destruction not been halted in 2007.

The AOC is the operational arm of the Kentucky Court of Justice and supports the activities of 4,000 court system employees, including the elected offices of justices, judges and circuit court clerks. The AOC also executes the Judicial Branch budget.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/372882/32822308

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AOC: Committee formed to review court records retention:

Comments

Stranger still, if this was SUCH an important issue - to keep non-enhanceable, misdemeanor records after the date that that they no longer appear on someone's record - WHY WEREN'T CONCERNED LAWYERS OR CITIZENS AT THIS MEETING? The meeting was publicized as open to the public - but not a single person showed-up to speak-up. Dave Stengel? Where were you?

The comments to this entry are closed.