Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

January 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

« DIET DRUG TRIAL: Deadlocked Jury and New Trial to be set for Gallion and Cunninham; Mills acquitted | Main | UofL LAW: Members of the Law Review for 2008-09 Announced »

Monday, July 07, 2008

LAWREADER BLOG: "Judge Joseph Bamberger has been criticized for approving a 49% fee for Fen Phen attorneys. But this is a smaller fee Kentucky’s highest court allowed in 1969 class action case."

Op Ed piece from Stan Billingsley styled "Judge Joseph Bamberger has been criticized for approving a 49% fee for Fen Phen attorneys. But this is a smaller fee Kentucky’s highest court allowed in 1969 class action case."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/372882/30950954

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference LAWREADER BLOG: "Judge Joseph Bamberger has been criticized for approving a 49% fee for Fen Phen attorneys. But this is a smaller fee Kentucky’s highest court allowed in 1969 class action case.":

Comments

Sorry, but I've got a real problem with hiding the amount attributable to each client from each client. There was about zero transparency.

The comments to this entry are closed.