Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Blog powered by TypePad

« December 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

January 2008

Thursday, January 31, 2008

COURTS: Chief Justice Lambert, lawmakers announce legislation to open court proceedings in child-protection cases

Chiefandpanel_300dpi5x71_2FRANKFORT, Ky., Jan. 30, 2008 - Chief Justice Joseph E. Lambert, Rep. Susan Westrom and Rep. Tom Burch announced legislation at a news conference today that would open certain Kentucky child-protection proceedings to the public. Child-protection court cases typically involve dependency, neglect and abuse, and termination of parental rights.

[photo: Chief Justice of Kentucky Joseph E. Lambert speaks to the public and media at a news conference Wednesday, Jan. 30, about legislation to open certain Kentucky child-protection proceedings to the public. Standing with Chief Justice Lambert are, from left, Deputy Secretary Steve Nunn of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Jefferson County Family Court Judge Patricia Walker FitzGerald, Sen. Julie Denton, Rep. Kathy Stein, Rep. Susan Westrom, Rep. Tom Burch and Patrick Yewell, executive officer of the Department of Juvenile Services at the Administrative Office of the Courts.]

Currently, all juvenile court proceedings in Kentucky are closed and the records sealed. The legislation would not include opening juvenile criminal proceedings.

The legislation, which is expected to be filed this week, would authorize the creation of three to seven pilot projects to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of opening child-protection proceedings to the public. The pilot projects would operate for four years and would help determine if the practice should be expanded statewide. The pilot sites have not been identified.

"This legislation is a groundbreaking first step in allowing greater public access to juvenile court proceedings," Chief Justice Lambert said. "It is vitally important that we maintain public trust and confidence in our child welfare system. This pilot program will give us time to learn whether opening child-protection proceedings to the public will bring about substantive improvements in our ability to protect Kentucky's children."

Rep. Westrom, D-Lexington, will be the bill's primary sponsor, and Rep. Burch, D-Louisville, will be the main co-sponsor.

"It's been a pleasure working on this initiative with the Chief Justice, who has the same desire I do in making sure families feel safe and heard in our courtrooms," Rep. Westrom said.

Increased transparency in child-protection proceedings may enhance accountability among judges, attorneys, social workers and other professionals who have roles in those cases, Chief Justice Lambert said. Opening the courts would also serve as a way to alert interested parties to the proceedings who would otherwise be unaware of them, such as extended family members who might want to show support.               

Rep. Burch, who is chairman of the House Health and Welfare Committee, said it is important for the public to have the ability to witness court proceedings in child-protection cases.

"It's about time the courts are opened up to let people see what goes on in decisions involving families," Rep. Burch said. "By opening up the courts, I feel the public would be better informed and would see the good and the bad in some of the court decisions. I really appreciate the help and involvement of Chief Justice Lambert in bringing this legislation forward. He is showing great leadership."

If the legislation passes, Chief Justice Lambert will be responsible for creating the corresponding Rules of Administrative Procedures under which the program would operate.

During the four-year pilot period, the Administrative Office of the Courts would monitor the program's guidelines and limitations, suggest potential improvements and recommend rule changes if the initiative were to be implemented statewide.

Under the legislation, the AOC would provide an annual report to the Legislative Research Commission, which would include statistics, findings and recommendations. The AOC would also prepare periodic progress and statistical reports and provide suggestions to the Interim Joint Committee on Health and Welfare and the Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary at the discretion of Chief Justice Lambert.

Further study of opening court proceedings in child-protection cases was a recommendation of the Transparency Workgroup of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services Blue Ribbon Panel on Adoption. Reps. Westrom and Burch are members of the panel, which is chaired by CHFS Deputy Secretary Steve Nunn.

"We view this legislation as an opportunity to explore the issue of transparency on a pilot basis," Deputy Secretary Nunn said. "We look forward to working with the courts to determine whether and when transparency is appropriate, while balancing the best interests of children in our care."

Rep. Kathy Stein, D-Lexington, praised the Blue Ribbon Panel on Adoption for its efforts. "The task force doing this work is to be congratulated for its production of this good beginning of a solution for a complex problem," said Rep. Stein, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee.

Kentucky is one of approximately 20 states that have completely closed proceedings in child-protection cases, according to the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. Other states have varying degrees of openness in their courts.

As the administrative and fiscal agent for the Kentucky Court of Justice, the AOC supports the activities of approximately 4,000 court system employees, including the elected offices of justices, judges and circuit court clerks.         

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

JUDICIAL ELECTION FILINGS: Here are the filings in Jefferson County races per SOS web site tonight!

Although these are obviously not final, but the web site seem complete since it reflects the last minute withdrawl of Ron Lewis and last minute filings of other candidates for his congressional seat.

Clayton is unchallenged and wins be default.  Six are vying for the circuit court bench, and 17 are in the race for district court.

Court of Appeals

Denise G. Clayton

Jefferson Circuit Court Div. 4

Charlie Cunningham
Louie Guenthner
N. George Shunnarah
Olu A. Stevens
Robert "Bob" Silverthorn
W. Douglas Kemper

Jefferson District Court Div. 16

Aaron J. Silletto
Allyson Cox
Ann Bailey Smith
Anne Dedman Watkins
Benjamin Francis Wyman
David P. Bowles
David Larry Holton II.
Jan Firkins Brightwell
Josephine Layne Buckner
Katie King
Laura Prater Russell
Linda Y. Atkins
Matthew H. Welch
Pat Mulvihill
Sheila Berman
Shelley Santry
Stephanie Pearce Burke

COURTS: CJ Lambert to propose opening juvenile civil proceedings; not juvenile criminal proceedings

Chief Justice of Kentucky Joseph E. Lambert will announce Wednesday that legislation will be filed that would open child protection courts to the public. The proposal will not apply to juvenile criminal proceedings, only to cases that involve children deemed by the state to be neglected or abused. Currently, Kentucky courtroom proceedings for both kinds of cases are closed and the records sealed.

COURTS: "Judge pushes up date, urges settlements in Ky. plane crash case"

The liability case against Comair for an August 2006 deadly plane crash in Kentucky will head to trial much earlier than expected. . . . U.S. District Judge Karl Forester announced he is setting a new trial date of Aug. 4 - four months earlier than lawyers on both sides were expecting.

COURTS: Judge rules Ragland civilly liable in 1994 death of UK football player

Fayette judge ruled Monday that Shane Ragland is liable in the death of Trent DiGiuro, the University of Kentucky football player who was gunned down in 1994. 

The question of how much Ragland owes the DiGiuros has not been determined. That will be determined in a jury trial, lawyers for both sides said. A jury will also decide whether the DiGiuros are entitled to punitive damages to punish Ragland, Judge Thomas Clark ruled.

The DiGiuro family's lawyer, Thomas Conway of Louisville, said he will ask for a trial to be scheduled for this summer.. . . .

COURTS: "Settlement tops $79 million in diocese suit"

About 240 people have now been awarded more than $79 million in a class-action settlement between victims of sexual abuse at the hands of church officials and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Covington in Northern Kentucky....

FILING DEADLINE TUESDAY FOR JUDICIAL RACES (1/29/2008)

The last date for filing to be on the May primary ballot is Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

The list of those who have filed thus far, can be found by clicking here.

Election Calendar for 2008 can be found at the Kentucky Board of Elections web site by clicking here.

However, as of now, the only "uncontested" local race is for the Court of Appeals vacancy. 

I am hopeful this Court of Appeals race will actually end up being a race so that the voters have a choice rather than an election by default.  If we are going to have elections (rather than selections), then the only way to do it is for the voters to have a meaningful choice with the qualifications of each candidate on the table to considered and examined.  The citizens of the Commonwealth deserve nothing less than a meaningful choice in all races for judge or justices.

This contrasts with the district court race with 12 announced candidates (and none of them currently sitting in an appointed seat).  There are two announced candidates for a vacancy on the Jefferson Circuit Court (with no appointment yet announced for that seat either).

However, I can understand the toll taken by those vying for public judicial office as they must evaluate the advantages of an incumbent or appointee and balance those advantages against the hardships of a year-long campaign which stresses family, friends, and finances.

BLOG: Some "comments" on the "comment" feature of this publication

As most know, this blawg has a feature which allows and even encourages posting of comments about the law.  Although, I have no "policy" on comments as such, I would like to take this opportunity to explain how this feature works and what comments remain and what stay.

First, comments are not "moderated" or screened before being published; and the only control is the authentication requirement to keep out automated spammers.  I rely upon this method since I have neither the time nor the inclination to be a hall monitor for all the remarks.  So, the simple fact that a comment has been made does not imply an endorsement, approval, or a disapproval of the remarks in the comment.  Nor does it reflect my opinions or the opinions of the blog or any editor of the blog.  Most imporantly, it does not even mean the comment was ever read by us or anyone else for that matter.

I am reminded of the fact that when I see a car with its turn signal blinking away, the only thing I can be sure of is that the feature is operable and working and not to assume the driver is making a turn (much less even knowing the signal is blinking away).  Same goes for the comments.

Second, this is not a forum for ex parte and out of court communications with the judges in a pending case.

Third, making hard remarks is one thing, but striking harsh, personal or foul blows is another.  When I catch these comments, I take them off the blog.  This is not a gossip column. 

Fourth, I do not wish this blog to repeat what happened in the case involving the physician who was blogging in the midst of a malpractice trial against him.  His posts contained remarks that were not favorable to the judge or the opposing attorney and potentially revealed strategies and discussions with his/her lawyer.  Such postings run the risk of breaching privilege and being used by the other side.

These are not policies as such.  Nor guidelines or rules of the road.  Just some leanings and a few preferences of mine. 

Sunday, January 27, 2008

JAN. 4, 2008 - KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS (2008:01)

JAN. 4, 2008 -  KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS (2008:01)

6th Cir. Published Decisions for Week of Jan. 21, 2008

6th Cir. Published Decisions for Week of Jan. 21, 2008 posted.